Lying
on the operating table in New York, sleepy but still awake and very
nervous, I could hear the two surgeons chatting as they began cutting
into my left eye. “That lens has to go,” said one.
A tiny pulling feeling. The “buckle” they were
sewing into my eye seemed to be causing problems. More tiny pulling
sensations. I started feeling claustrophobic under the green mask that
covered my good eye but left the injured one exposed to their blades.
I knew what was going on because I had opted to go
under the knife with a local anaesthetic.
The surgeons weren’t sure what they would find
when they went in. A 6mm piece of shrapnel had blasted through my eye,
entering the front right side and tearing out through the retina that
lines the eye, detaching it completely. “How are you doing in
there?” asked Dr Stanley Chang, the eye surgeon who had invented some
of the microsurgery equipment he was using to operate on me.
From their conversation, I could tell that blood
was the main problem. The shrapnel had caused extensive haemorrhaging in
the eye and blood had pooled behind the retina. To reattach the retina
and save the eye, the blood needed to be scraped out, bit by microscopic
bit, so as not to damage the retina further.
Scrape, scrape, scrape; I was now about four hours
into the operation.
The days before the surgery had been full of dread.
I had been exhausted but hopeful the night I
arrived in New York by air medivac from Sri Lanka. It was late on April
19, three days after soldiers fired the grenade that injured me. My
mother and my sister Cat were waiting for me at Columbia Presbyterian
hospital. So was Chang.
He examined my eye and then sat with me in his
darkened office to give me a verdict I had not expected. He said he
would try to save the eye, but didn’t think the chances were good with
such a traumatic injury.
The worst part of the operation came towards the
end. Chang tried again and again to reattach the retina, but couldn’t
do it. I remember at one point hearing him saying with grim
determination: “We are going to attach this retina,” in a voice that
made it clear he was not going to give up.
A nurse calmed me, took it off and wheeled me into
recovery.
The ordeal had just begun, however. Nurses were
under orders to lay me on my stomach to keep the retina and oil in place
in the eye. The next three days passed in a haze. I remember thinking I
want this eye out, regretting ever agreeing to surgery to save it, just
wanting the pain to go away.
On the fourth day, I went to a rented service flat
in New York City to recuperate. My eye was covered in a bulky white
bandage. I presented a bizarre spectacle to the curious, because I had
to walk looking at the ground to keep the retina and oil in place.
I was still under doctor’s orders to lie on my
stomach for a week. This seemed torture just to think of. But there was
one thing I had to do before getting into bed.
I smoked a couple of cigarettes and went into the
bathroom. I took off the bandage and looked up into the mirror for the
first time.
No flower comparisons came to mind. The pain made
my eye feel like the enemy. The eye itself looked even worse.
It was swollen to the size of a peach, bright red,
with a thin line - like that little indentation that peaches have across
their middles - the only evidence that the two lids had ever opened or
would ever open again.
I went and lay on my stomach, my head off the foot
of the bed, looking face down through a weird contraption that seemed
like an inverted and padded toilet seat. With one eye, I examined the
carpet.
With nothing to distract it, my mind began playing
endless reruns of what had happened to me. I didn’t feel the need to
consult Freud; my subconscious was clearly seeking an outcome it liked
better. The pain of being shot was not the focus of my nightmares, but
that didn’t make them much more bearable.
I had been wounded trying to leave the northern,
Tamil area of Sri Lanka and re-enter the government-controlled south at
the end of an assignment to visit the Tamil Tigers, the LTTE.
Leaving LTTE territory was not a simple matter of
hitching a ride. For the past six years, the government in Colombo has
banned journalists from the area, hoping to hide the catastrophic
humanitarian crisis engulfing 500,000 Tamil civilians bottled up behind
a siege line of army bases. I had to cross this line clandestinely.
For two nights the guides decided it was too
dangerous to cross. The third night, April 16, after we had squatted for
hours in a rice paddy, bitten by mosquitoes I couldn’t swat for fear
the noise would be heard, the lead guide waved us quietly forwards.
Ahead lay ditches, a road and a deep expanse of
open ground. In the distance was the jungle. I took my shoes off; one of
the things I had learnt was how difficult it is to walk in water wearing
shoes. As we ran, stooped low, towards the safety of the jungle, a
rolling flash erupted from the right. Sri Lankan soldiers in a forward
listening post had opened fire. I crawled on my belly as long as the
gunfire lasted, frantically, as if I could somehow escape. Flares went
up, arcing high into the sky and falling slowly, turning night to day. I
was trapped in a field, behind a clump of weeds, alone. And that’s
where the nightmares always begin.
My mind has recorded in exact detail what happened
next, except that the tape is slowed down and spools endlessly. Soldiers
are coming for me in the night, and I have to make a decision. They come
forward inexorably, endlessly.
In reality, I think I only lay in the field for
about half an hour. Finally, aware that if they stumbled on me they
would shoot me, I shouted “journalist”. They fired a grenade at the
sound of my voice. Shrapnel hit me with a shocking impact of pain and
noise.
Usually that wakes me up, but sometimes the dream
continues and I am walking forward - as I did that night when I figured
out I wasn’t going to die, and I kept yelling, and someone speaking
English told me to stand up, and I went on walking and falling down at
times from weakness and shock and loss of blood. Only, in the dream, I
am being shot at each time I fall, and I can feel what it is like to be
shot across the chest.
The first time I went out alone on the street with
my new pirate-patch look, I couldn’t cope. I had left my bag of
clothes - along with my computer and satellite phone - behind at the
scene in Sri Lanka, and I thought it would be a simple matter to buy
some more.
People on the street glanced at my eye patch and
looked away, but the doorman at my apartment block asked: “What the
heck happened to you?” American friends said they loved the patch but
wanted see what was behind it.
I have been asked if my trip to Sri Lanka was worth
it. One blunt BBC reporter argued in an interview, not unkindly: “Some
people would say it was stupid, Marie.” Was it? That’s a hard
question to answer.
Certainly, Sri Lanka is a forgotten conflict. Some
83,000 people have died since the country exploded in civil war in 1983,
a loss barely noticed except by their families.
On a smaller scale, however, the trip did seem to
me worthwhile. I may be exhausted and haunted, but not all the images
that flash back to me evoke dread. I remember a government agent in a
town in the Wanni - the region controlled by the LTTE - who put his neck
on the line just to give me information.
He had facts and figures of the type that make
on-the-ground reporting worthwhile. I wanted to resolve two
contradictory stories: the government in Colombo claimed to be
distributing food to Tamil civilians on the same monthly basis as the
rest of the country, yet in village after village people told me they
received little. Many were painfully thin.
Not everyone was as easily persuaded that I was
worth talking to. Father Xavier, the Roman Catholic priest of Mallawi,
was garrulous, opinionated and angry. He told me he had given up on the
West: nobody cared about the plight of the Tamils, why should he waste
his time talking to me. So what if I was the first journalist to come to
the Wanni in six years? Western television cameras went to famines in
Africa every year. They sent back pictures from Kosovo of Serbian
killings. What about here?
“People tell me they feel they have suffered so
much, it is not worth ending the war to return to the same situation,”
he said. “They have lost their homes, their land, their sons and
daughters. The only way to end the war is for the Tamils to have their
self-determination.” The government siege had turned people to the
Tamil Tigers. “I know you in the West say they are terrorists,” he
said. “Here, they are the only people that have protected us Tamils
from being chopped up.”
A surprising amount of mail arrived from Sri Lanka
during my weeks of recuperation. Messages from Tamils were mostly
sympathetic. None was under the impression that I supported their cause,
but they sent heart-rending appreciations for providing the first report
on their homeland in years.
The Sinhalese majority was divided. A man wrote
from Colombo: “I am not a Tamil, but if there were more journalists
reporting the truth as you did, this war would be over in 24 hours.”
Others were less kind. One of the more printable
Sinhalese critics - a woman claiming to be a doctor - wrote: “If you
sleep with dogs, you wake up with bugs.”
So, was I stupid? Stupid I would feel writing a
column about the dinner party I went to last night. Equally, I’d
rather be in that middle ground between a desk job and getting shot, no
offence to desk jobs.
For my part, the next war I cover, I’ll be more
awed than ever by the quiet bravery of civilians who endure far more
than I ever will. They must stay where they are; I can come home to
London.