<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Happened 65 Years Ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/</link>
	<description>Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chula Rajapakse</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Chula Rajapakse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tamil people have little to complain about regards their treatment by the British
They were the favoured minority of the &quot;Devide &amp; Rule&quot; , British colonial policy while the Sinhales were the victimised majority.
Any attempt to rectify this victimisations have been resisted by Tamil leaders with two Velupullais, first V Chelvanayakam &amp; then V Prabakaran , offering the greatest  resistance the former with the pen and the latter with the sword.

Now, time has come to bury the hatchet and move together as one Sri Lanka nation led by the first leader of post independent sri Lanka who is articulate in all three languages , English, Tamil and Sinhalese and committed to the cause of developing all of Sri Lanka as a happy home land for all of it&#039;s peole as Sri Lankans , irrespective of ethnicity .

Let us all join him and support him in this effort, as this  would be what is best for all .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamil people have little to complain about regards their treatment by the British<br />
They were the favoured minority of the &#8220;Devide &amp; Rule&#8221; , British colonial policy while the Sinhales were the victimised majority.<br />
Any attempt to rectify this victimisations have been resisted by Tamil leaders with two Velupullais, first V Chelvanayakam &amp; then V Prabakaran , offering the greatest  resistance the former with the pen and the latter with the sword.</p>
<p>Now, time has come to bury the hatchet and move together as one Sri Lanka nation led by the first leader of post independent sri Lanka who is articulate in all three languages , English, Tamil and Sinhalese and committed to the cause of developing all of Sri Lanka as a happy home land for all of it&#8217;s peole as Sri Lankans , irrespective of ethnicity .</p>
<p>Let us all join him and support him in this effort, as this  would be what is best for all .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vibhushana</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Vibhushana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 04:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are correct.  It was the Union Jack that reached these parts in 1832.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct.  It was the Union Jack that reached these parts in 1832.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vibhushana</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Vibhushana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Angela,

Please allow me to re-iterate.  Malabar culture is an import to Celyon.  The origins of Tamil cutlure is elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Angela,</p>
<p>Please allow me to re-iterate.  Malabar culture is an import to Celyon.  The origins of Tamil cutlure is elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nakushta</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Nakushta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arun, Thank you for putting this important point across.  I&#039;m no fan of GG clan. But hi, give the man his due!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arun, Thank you for putting this important point across.  I&#8217;m no fan of GG clan. But hi, give the man his due!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachi Sri Kantha</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachi Sri Kantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May I comment on the thoughts of Batticaloa Tamil (Oct.23)? I have answered your doubts in the very first paragraph. Whether my commentary is constructive or destructive, it is for each reader to decide. History needs to be written by the Tamils and I cannot please each Tamil.

Critic Vibushana (Oct.20), I guess is a non-Tamil. For the benefit of this correspondent, I cite the following lines from Prof.K.M.de Silva&#039;s &#039;A History of Sri Lanka (1981). &quot;The British did not set up a unified administrative system for the whole island till 1832...The Colebrooke-Cameron reforms of 1832 provided the legislative and administrative (including judicial) framework for Sri Lanka&#039;s unification&quot; (p.235). The Sinhala lion flag never reached Jaffna and Batticaloa until 1832. I also want to make a comment on the chosen pen-name Vibushana. Vibishana (a sibling of King Ravana), from which I guess you have adopted your name, is considered as a traitor in epic Ramanayana, who switched sides. As such, his name has suffered historically and no child is given this traitor&#039;s name among the Hindus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I comment on the thoughts of Batticaloa Tamil (Oct.23)? I have answered your doubts in the very first paragraph. Whether my commentary is constructive or destructive, it is for each reader to decide. History needs to be written by the Tamils and I cannot please each Tamil.</p>
<p>Critic Vibushana (Oct.20), I guess is a non-Tamil. For the benefit of this correspondent, I cite the following lines from Prof.K.M.de Silva&#8217;s &#8216;A History of Sri Lanka (1981). &#8220;The British did not set up a unified administrative system for the whole island till 1832&#8230;The Colebrooke-Cameron reforms of 1832 provided the legislative and administrative (including judicial) framework for Sri Lanka&#8217;s unification&#8221; (p.235). The Sinhala lion flag never reached Jaffna and Batticaloa until 1832. I also want to make a comment on the chosen pen-name Vibushana. Vibishana (a sibling of King Ravana), from which I guess you have adopted your name, is considered as a traitor in epic Ramanayana, who switched sides. As such, his name has suffered historically and no child is given this traitor&#8217;s name among the Hindus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Arun Vincent</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Arun Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Batti Tamil,
Take it from me. GG NEVER voted in favor of Citizenship Act. I hear this from many people who learnt history from Virakesari and Suthanthiran. That was not the reason either for SJV to defect from Tamil Congress. This was the false campaign of Federal Party and so sadly, SJV kept his bloody mouth shut when this false campaign was unleashed against his former leader. 

If you all are really interested to know the truth, read SJV&#039;s son in law&#039;s book on the biography of SJV. As a learned man, Prof. Wilson had given credit to GG and had acknowledged that GG was a great leader of Tamils. But like SJV, GG was not an extremist. In Sangam website you can find the speech GG made to state council in 1947, asking for balanced representation. It was not 50:50. Balanced representation was much different from 50:50.

In the state council when the independence bill was argued in 1947, GG was in Whitehall, UK fighting with the Lords to delay the grant of independence to Ceylon. He knew then that if independence is granted without adequate protection to Tamils, Sinhalese would over power due to their numbers. Knowing GG&#039;s political sagacity [something SJV totally lacked] DS Senanayke rushed the bill and the TAMIL members voted in favor. On return GG was shocked to learn that his Tamil counterparts had let him down. He went into seclusion out of frustration.

When he came out, he proposed and eloquently argued for balanced representation which is sarcastically known as 50:50. That also failed.  SJV was with GG even at this stage. When everything failed, GG said the only hope is to work with the majority and get the maximum out it. SJV said no. SJV wanted to continue the collision course with the majority. Then came the defection. 

By accepting the ministerial post of Minister of industry, GG developed the north and east which no other person had done as of this day. Had he continued or had he been allowed to continue, north and east would be flourishing today.

What SJV had done to the Tamils and to the Tamil land? Nothing other than emotionally charging them. The only difference between SJV and VP is that the former advocated only non violence and VP advocated violence. Finally both ended in destruction. At least in death bed, SJV should have acknowledged the wisdom of his leader, GG. 

Again never say that GG voted depriving the citizenship of Tamils of upcountry. Careful when you write something wrong more seriously like this. First learn the history from original sources instead from Tamil tabloids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Batti Tamil,<br />
Take it from me. GG NEVER voted in favor of Citizenship Act. I hear this from many people who learnt history from Virakesari and Suthanthiran. That was not the reason either for SJV to defect from Tamil Congress. This was the false campaign of Federal Party and so sadly, SJV kept his bloody mouth shut when this false campaign was unleashed against his former leader. </p>
<p>If you all are really interested to know the truth, read SJV&#8217;s son in law&#8217;s book on the biography of SJV. As a learned man, Prof. Wilson had given credit to GG and had acknowledged that GG was a great leader of Tamils. But like SJV, GG was not an extremist. In Sangam website you can find the speech GG made to state council in 1947, asking for balanced representation. It was not 50:50. Balanced representation was much different from 50:50.</p>
<p>In the state council when the independence bill was argued in 1947, GG was in Whitehall, UK fighting with the Lords to delay the grant of independence to Ceylon. He knew then that if independence is granted without adequate protection to Tamils, Sinhalese would over power due to their numbers. Knowing GG&#8217;s political sagacity [something SJV totally lacked] DS Senanayke rushed the bill and the TAMIL members voted in favor. On return GG was shocked to learn that his Tamil counterparts had let him down. He went into seclusion out of frustration.</p>
<p>When he came out, he proposed and eloquently argued for balanced representation which is sarcastically known as 50:50. That also failed.  SJV was with GG even at this stage. When everything failed, GG said the only hope is to work with the majority and get the maximum out it. SJV said no. SJV wanted to continue the collision course with the majority. Then came the defection. </p>
<p>By accepting the ministerial post of Minister of industry, GG developed the north and east which no other person had done as of this day. Had he continued or had he been allowed to continue, north and east would be flourishing today.</p>
<p>What SJV had done to the Tamils and to the Tamil land? Nothing other than emotionally charging them. The only difference between SJV and VP is that the former advocated only non violence and VP advocated violence. Finally both ended in destruction. At least in death bed, SJV should have acknowledged the wisdom of his leader, GG. </p>
<p>Again never say that GG voted depriving the citizenship of Tamils of upcountry. Careful when you write something wrong more seriously like this. First learn the history from original sources instead from Tamil tabloids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you should read some of the other articles on the site about the history of Sri Lanka, before you state that Tamils are foreigners to the country. As far as most historians are concerned, Sri lanka  &quot;history&quot; is purely dependent on legends created with mythological elements. Unfortunately not much or any research has been formally conducted on the actual origin of the Sinhalese and the presence of Tamils on the island. I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s purposely avoided within Sri Lanka due to ethnocentric and chauvinist views of the majority population and their disbelief at ever finding anything as equally credible as their overly venerated myths, but  some more rational types from other countries have taken interest in discovering the lost and hidden truth of the country. There are some credible and rational articles here and I&#039;m sure if you take the time to look yourself, that argue that the sinhalese are in fact a Dravidian derived people and they never came from north india to establish anything but were in fact separated from the indigenous Tamil population by religion. Their language is considered indo European due to the emergence of the Tamil dialects of the island with Pali, the liturgical language of Buddhism, which is related to Sanskrit. That being said the Sinhalese were borne from the Tamils, who had long established  kingdoms within the islands and who were not limited to Hinduism as their central religion but embraced Buddhism as it spread, thus creating a separate group based solely on religion who spread outward into the south and west of the island. This group was Tamil yet only differed overtime with language and religion. There are many scholars out there that support and argue it, with much historical and archaeological evidence to back up this growing theory, if you just look. Thank you that is all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should read some of the other articles on the site about the history of Sri Lanka, before you state that Tamils are foreigners to the country. As far as most historians are concerned, Sri lanka  &#8220;history&#8221; is purely dependent on legends created with mythological elements. Unfortunately not much or any research has been formally conducted on the actual origin of the Sinhalese and the presence of Tamils on the island. I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s purposely avoided within Sri Lanka due to ethnocentric and chauvinist views of the majority population and their disbelief at ever finding anything as equally credible as their overly venerated myths, but  some more rational types from other countries have taken interest in discovering the lost and hidden truth of the country. There are some credible and rational articles here and I&#8217;m sure if you take the time to look yourself, that argue that the sinhalese are in fact a Dravidian derived people and they never came from north india to establish anything but were in fact separated from the indigenous Tamil population by religion. Their language is considered indo European due to the emergence of the Tamil dialects of the island with Pali, the liturgical language of Buddhism, which is related to Sanskrit. That being said the Sinhalese were borne from the Tamils, who had long established  kingdoms within the islands and who were not limited to Hinduism as their central religion but embraced Buddhism as it spread, thus creating a separate group based solely on religion who spread outward into the south and west of the island. This group was Tamil yet only differed overtime with language and religion. There are many scholars out there that support and argue it, with much historical and archaeological evidence to back up this growing theory, if you just look. Thank you that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devendra</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Devendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s equally important to indicate that G G Ponnampalam asked for 50:50 but surrendered his policy when offered a cabinet post and supported the Citizenship Act that deprived upcountry Tamils their representation in parliament. Douglas Devananda fought for Eelam and still call his party Eelam People Democratic Party but support the government in their drive to militarise and Sinhalamise the Tamil speaking province, North-East.

Tamil leaders fight among themselves to form political parties and lead them but auction themselves for ministerial posts. Mahakavi Barathiyar  would have sung,&#039; when will Tamils&#039; thirst for party leadership be quenched, when will they stop surrendering their principles for ministerial portfolios&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s equally important to indicate that G G Ponnampalam asked for 50:50 but surrendered his policy when offered a cabinet post and supported the Citizenship Act that deprived upcountry Tamils their representation in parliament. Douglas Devananda fought for Eelam and still call his party Eelam People Democratic Party but support the government in their drive to militarise and Sinhalamise the Tamil speaking province, North-East.</p>
<p>Tamil leaders fight among themselves to form political parties and lead them but auction themselves for ministerial posts. Mahakavi Barathiyar  would have sung,&#8217; when will Tamils&#8217; thirst for party leadership be quenched, when will they stop surrendering their principles for ministerial portfolios&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batticaloa Tamil</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Batticaloa Tamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would respectfully submit that this article is not constructive. The Tamil people are facing possible annihilation and we ought not to be attacking past Tamil cabinet members. Its time to strategize about the future, forge international alliances and ensure the security of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka. I am personally not a fan of Sundaralingam but he was an accomplished person. And no one had let down our people as G.G. Ponnambalam did as he supported D.S. Senanayake&#039;s disenfranchisement of the Indian Tamils in 1948.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would respectfully submit that this article is not constructive. The Tamil people are facing possible annihilation and we ought not to be attacking past Tamil cabinet members. Its time to strategize about the future, forge international alliances and ensure the security of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka. I am personally not a fan of Sundaralingam but he was an accomplished person. And no one had let down our people as G.G. Ponnambalam did as he supported D.S. Senanayake&#8217;s disenfranchisement of the Indian Tamils in 1948.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://sangam.org/happened-65-years/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangam.org/?p=884#comment-213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please stop developing srilanka, tamil eelam needs to be free! http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=96586449]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop developing srilanka, tamil eelam needs to be free! <a href="http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=96586449" rel="nofollow">http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=96586449</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: sangam.org @ 2013-06-20 04:31:33 by W3 Total Cache -->