Comment on 'A Lapse in Diplomatic Security'
by Victor Rajakulendran
It has become completely clear now that this accepted procedure was ignored in this incident.
Therefore, the only way this mishap could have happened is only if GoSL conspired to do so.
|
Anthony Dias has taken the Sangam editor for a free ride to post material which is not sufficiently tough on the unscrupulous Sri Lankan government.
This is obvious from the fact that Dias has carefully avoided mentioning any
suspicions about a conspiracy by the Sri Lankan government, while all the
evidence points in that direction. Dias brings in the argument that the
UN officials who charted the 5-seater aircraft to transport their
officials attending the same meeting the diplomats were travelling for,
would have known that the airfield is always subject to attack by LTTE.
Dias is also trying to put the blame on Embassy security officers as they
have failed to get the intelligence information and properly advise their
own Diplomats.
All the people cannot be fooled all
the time. This was made clear when the US Ambassador reiterated again and
again that the LTTE did not target the Diplomats. That is, the Diplomats
and their security officers always know the threat to aircraft landing
there. But they also are aware of the procedures in place when Diplomats
travel to the conflict areas. That is, both sides to the conflict are
informed so that they act responsibly and have done so in the past. It
has become completely clear now that this accepted procedure was ignored in this
incident.
Therefore, the only way this mishap could have happened is only if GoSL
conspired to do so. What happened was that the Diplomats were led
to believe that the usual procedures were in place and the Diplomats did
not suspect the GoSL, as this is not the first time Diplomats of the US, Italy,
Germany and France have visited the conflict zone. They might not have landed
in the same place in the east, but have landed in Palaly and Trincomale.
And the LTTE did not fire at any of these missions, although LTTE has fired
at these landing sites, targeting the SL security personal, several times
before.
I would like to ask Dias why, after the UN-charted aircraft was attacked and
after that aircraft took off to a safe place, and after keeping both the
helicopters airborne without landing for 20 minutes, the Sri Lankan
security officials allowed the helicopters to land in an adjoining field
(Webber stadium). This clearly shows that the whole episode was well
planned by the SL security apparatus, mainly at the Secretary of the
Defence Ministry level, and obediently carried out down the line to harm
the Diplomats with LTTE fire. The purpose is, obviously to pitch the international community
against the LTTE, ridicule the intelligence of the international community and to prove that
the interational community is incompetent to show the GoSL a way to solve this conflict. This
is why Dias concludes that, instead of doctoring the parties to the conflict
especially the GoSL, these Diplomats should doctor themselves.
Poor
Minister Samarasinghe has been used as the sacrificial lamb by the
ruthless Rajapaksa brothers, but he has narrowly escaped thanks to the UN
officials who conveyed the message to Kilinochchi and made the LTTE
realise the situation and stop the attack instantly.
Sangam Editor needs to be vigilant about these self-proclaimed, so-called
"Security Analysts" like the Anthony Dias type.
|