Ilankai Tamil Sangam28th Year on the Web Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA |
|||
Home Archives |
Human Rights Charade and the Delusions of Rajan Hooleby Sachi Sri Kantha, May 12, 2007
Amnesty International and Democracy It has been announced on May 4, 2007 that Rajan Hoole and Kopalasingham Sritharan of Sri Lanka were two of the three awardees of the 2007 Martin Ennals Award (MEA) for Human Rights Defenders. Human Rights Defenders, huh! The third awardee for this year, sharing the spotlight with Hoole and Sritharan is one Pierre Claver Mbonimpa of Burundi. I don’t know anything about Mbonimpa, but I have kept track of the activities of Hoole and Sritharan since 1990. So, permit me to state something about the questionable quality of the human rights service of this duo. This MEA award (as per the website information) was created in 1993, to honor the contributions of Martin Ennals (1927-1991), who was a livewire of Amnesty International. The first awardee was one Harry Wu of China in 1994. This year’s jury who anointed Hoole, Sritharan and Mbonimpa consisted of reps from 11 organizations or institutions (including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Huridocs and International Alert) of the human rights industry, which certainly has become a big business in the past two decades. It is pertinent to note that when Nelson Mandela was languishing in a South African jail from the 1960s to 1980s, these human rights watchdogs (if they had been founded then) treated him as a pariah. In his autobiography ‘Long Walk to Freedom’ (1994), Mandela sarcastically noted Amnesty International’s role as follows:
But check the website of Amnesty International now. In its history lines, there is a sentence which notes that Amnesty International was an ‘observer’ in the Mandela trial. Huh! This year’s anointed human rights awardees from Sri Lanka, Hoole and Sritharan, have barked from the rooftop about their conviction about the foundations of democracy and have demonized the LTTE and its leadership for destroying democratic traditions among the Eelam Tamils. Again, Mandela provided a legitimate answer in his autobiography, which fits our blessed island as well. To quote Mandela,
Even long before Mandela, that penetrative observer of human foibles and follies, Bernard Shaw, had written about the worthlessness of democracy as practised in Britain and elsewhere. In his preface to the play, ‘The Apple Cart: a Political Extravaganza’ (1928), Shaw skewered democracy as follows:
Sure, it is too much to expect our local human rights barkers, Hoole and Sritharan, to posess the lucid brain and clear vision of Mandela or Shaw. But these two so-called activists do boast paper qualifications attesting to postgraduate degrees in mathematics. However, Eelam Tamils have been kept in the dark so far about their noteworthy achievements in mathematics. Eelam Tamils certainly know about Prof. Christie Jeyam Eliezer, a world-class mathematician, who was also a Tamil human rights activist. I have no hesitation in stating that compared to Prof. Eliezer’s contributions in academia and human rights activism in three countries (Ceylon, Malaysia and Australia), the so-called “achievements” of Hoole and Sritharan in human rights activism on behalf of Tamils is miniscule at best and laughable at worst. Deception in Name The claim to “recognition” by Hoole and Sritharan rests on their churning out “Briefings”, “Bulletins”, “Reports”, “Special Reports”, and “Statements” at regular intervals, since 1989, to “highlight” human right abuses in Sri Lanka, which they have passed to the print media under the dubious and deceptive name, “University Teachers for Human Rights – Jaffna” (UTHR). Deception in the name should be the last thing for social reformers who wish to stand on their own legs. In his recent email interview to M.R. Narayan Swamy for the Indo-Asian News Service [May 6, 2007] following the announcement of the MEA, Rajan Hoole stated,
Holy Spirit! Now Hoole lets the proverbial cat out of the bag, incompletely though. He is just exposing the four legs and the tail of the cat. Let me repeat. (1) He was “helped immensely by Sinhalese friends”. (2) He was “never left homeless or in want”. (3) He “didn’t maintain an office or establishment”. (4) “Formal donor funds were sought only for publication expenses.” Even if he was not maintaining “an office or establishment”, he preferred to stick to releasing his “reports, briefings, statements, and what not” under the deceptive name, “University Teachers for Human Rights – Jaffna”, for which the then Vice Chancellor Prof.A. Thurairajah issued a restrained disapproval. A news release dated 16th November 1992 under the signature of Prof.A. Thurairajah, stated [the phrase in bold font, as in the original]:
Even after this restrained disapproval by the Faculty Council of the University of Jaffna, Hoole and Sritharan continued to use the deceptive name ‘University Teachers for Human Rights – Jaffna’ for their publicity and camouflage for a non-existing “office or establishment.” Secretive Sponsorship and Inaccurate Posturing You name your sponsors and I can tell your bias and partiality. Now, Rajan Hoole tells us that he was “helped immensely by Sinhalese friends”. One has valid reasons to doubt that his sponsors were/are not only from a “Left background”, but also from the power-holding and power-sharing mandarin classes among the Sinhalese. This thus reflects in his churned out “reports” and “briefings”. In the 1990s, more than once, I bothered to comment critically on these UTHR “reports” and “briefings”, when they appeared in the Tamil Times (London) magazine. But the editor [P. Rajanayagam, if I’m not wrong] of Tamil Times was a fan of UTHR-J, and while he allocated reams of pages for the insipid “reports” and “briefings” of UTHR-J, he would permit only brief rebuttals by the readers. Here is one, I wrote and which appeared in print. Tamil Leadership [Tamil Times, January 15, 1997] After reading the lengthy Special Report No.7 by the University Teachers for Human Rights, Jaffna, I am disappointed that the authors trot out a stale tune as their solution to the vexing problem in Sri Lanka. They conclude that ‘for the Tamil community to survive as a cultural and ethnic identity’, a ‘new leadership will have to be helped to emerge…’ [Tamil Times, Nov.’96]. That’s funny. I have heard this tune for the past 35 years since 1961, when the then (and current) Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike sent the army for the first time to Jaffna. Long before the LTTE made its way into the lexicon of South Asian politics, the ruling Sinhalese establishment as well as a certain section of vociferous Leftist intellectuals have made the same criticism on the leadership of S.J.V. Chelvanayakam and A. Amirthalingam, even though these two stalwarts never touched a gun to speak for Tamil rights. Towards their ends, both the UNP and SLFP had presented ‘puppets’ like Devanayagams, Kumarasooriyars and Kadirgamars as the Tamil leaders and the Tamil population never even bothered to blink their eyes on these ‘puppets’. The authors of the Special Report No.7 also has written about the ambivalence of Tamils in supporting the LTTE. I only wish that they should first recognize their ignorance on the history of freedom movements of this century before trying to hold the LTTE to a stricter code of morality under trying circumstances, than for example Mao’s guerrillas or PLO rebels. Prabhakaran may not have a university degree, but he surely has heeded one of Einstein’s maxims: ‘Organised power can be opposed only by organised power.’ I should add here that quite a few other critical letters of mine sent to the Tamil Times magazine about the dubious quality of these UTHR-J “reports” and “briefings” had gone unpublished.
Dispersal of Gossip, Hearsay and Innuendo One characteristic feature of Rajan Hoole’s writings is the dispersal of street gossip, barber-shop gossip and kitchen hearsay as certified facts. Almost all of these were aimed at slighting and demonizing the LTTE and its leadership. Of course, he has to please his Sinhalese sponsors, doesn't he? Sometimes this sophomoric gossip and hearsay make hilarious reading. The cited sources are almost always unnamed and hidden to prevent independent verification. I quote an example, culled from his book awkwardly titled ‘Sri Lanka: The Arrogance of Power – Myths, Decadence and Murder’ (2001): What a childish nonsense! And this sort of gibberish by Hoole passes as human rights activism! But, Hoole knows what to tell to his sponsors. LTTEers getting goose bumps on prancing ghosts does make a good story for Hoole’s Sinhalese sponsors, right? |
||
|