The Asiaweek magazine, published
from Hong Kong for 26 years, folded abruptly on November 29 of last year.
Its owner the Time-Warner Inc. opted to pull its plug on the Asiaweek
magazine following the financial fallout from the September 11
incidents in New York.
Since its inception in 1975, the
Asiaweek magazine had provided continuous coverage on the Tamil
politics and culture. It featured the LTTE leader Pirabhakaran in its
cover on more than one occasion. In its waning years, since 1994, it had
published offensive and unverified coverage on the LTTE, to salvage its
meager sales figures in Sri Lanka.
However, the Asiaweek magazine also
frequently provided me space to present my views in its Letter’s Page. I
should be grateful for that privilege. Apart from me, Ana Pararajasingham
from Australia also contributed a few letters presenting our point of
view. Nearly 40 of my brief letters (most in mangled versions of course)
were published in the Asiaweek magazine between 1987 and 1996. An
equal number of the letters posted and faxed to the editorial desk went
unpublished.
In one of such unpublished letters, I had
even humorously predicted the demise of Asiaweek, before it
actually happened.
The role of Asiaweek in elevating
the stature of LTTE in the eyes of Asian readers beyond the boundaries of
India deserve an in-depth analysis and time permitting, it will be done at
a later time.
I present below a 1990-1991 debate in
which I participated with a Sri Lankan (?) correspondent, who did not have
the courtesy or gumption to identify himself or herself. It was about
comparing Tamil Tigers with America’s Founding Fathers.
A Debate on Tamil Tigers and
America’s Founding Fathers
I present below excerpts of six letters
(three of mine, and three from that anonymous correspondent) in which the
issue of Tamil Tigers and America’s Founding Fathers was touched
peripherally.
In the excerpts which follow, the terms ‘loyalists’
and ‘dissidents’ refer to those who opposed George
Washington, and the term ‘rebels’ refer to those who
supported the American leader of independence.
Letter 1: (by Sachi Sri Kantha, in
Asiaweek, Aug.31, 1990)
“…Only a minority of
Americans supported the revolution in the 1770s. John Adams noted that
about a third of the population were hostile to the idea [of independence]
and a third were quite indifferent. That did not deter America’s founding
fathers from fighting British colonialism.”
Letter 2: (by an anonymous correspondent,
in Asiaweek, Oct.19, 1990)
“…Citing John Adams,
Sachi Sri Kantha of Philadelphia implies that America’s founding fathers,
like the Tamil Tigers, represented a minority when they fought British
colonialism. It would be interesting to know whether they, like the Tamil
Tigers, summarily executed fellow citizens who did not share their
revolutionary fervour.”
Letter 3: (by Sachi Sri Kantha, in
Asiaweek, Nov.16, 1990)
“Perhaps the reader
who wrote on ‘Sri Lanka’s Tamils’ should read more history instead of
musing whether America’s Founding Fathers, ‘like the Tamil Tigers,
summarily executed fellow citizens who did not share their revolutionary
fervour’. As many as 100,000 people who supported British rule (almost 1
in 30 of the people in the original thirteen states) chose to leave the
newly formed U.S. for England, Canada and the West Indies. Why? Historians
say countless loyalists were tarred and feathered. Why are there hardly
any versions of the loyalist point of view? Simply because they were not
tolerated by the founding fathers. Consider the fate of
hero-turned-traitor Benedict Arnold. After the war he had to leave
Philadelphia for London, where he died in obscurity.”
Letter 4: (by the Anonymous correspondent,
in Asiaweek, Dec.14, 1990)
“Thanks to Sachi Sri
Kantha of Philadelphia I now know the difference between Sri Lanka’s Tamil
Tigers and America’s founding fathers. The fathers merely tarred and
feathered dissidents; the Tigers summarily execute them…”
Letter 5: (by Sachi Sri Kantha, in
Asiaweek, Feb.8, 1991)
“The naďve and
anonymous reader who thinks America’s founding fathers ‘merely tarred and
feathered dissidents’ and did not execute them is wrong. In many cases
tarring and feathering was only the preliminary phase of the punishment of
loyalists and was followed by hanging.
For example, in 1774
one John Malcomb, an officer of the Customs at Boston, was ‘tarred,
feathered and led to the gallows with a rope about his neck’ [Oxford
English Dictionary, 1989].
On June 27, 1776, Thomas Hickey became the first American soldier to be
executed in New York City. He was condemned as a traitor for conspiring to
deliver George Washington to the British [The Encyclopedia of American
Facts and Dates, 1987]. In March 1779 John Mason of the Loyal American
Rangers warned that the loyalists would henceforth hang six rebels for
every loyalist so dealt with. [the book: Secret History of the American
Revolution, 1941]. Trying to portray America’s founding fathers as
paragons compared to the Tamil Tigers is preposterous.”
Letter 6 (by the Anonymous correspondent,
in Asiaweek, March 15, 1991)
“Sri Kantha does not
deny that the Tamil Tigers have massacred thousands, including other
Tamils, in their fight for a separate state. He defends them by arguing
that the Tigers are no different from the likes of George Washington. One
cannot argue against such a value judgement.”
My
Impressions
Value judgement or not, in this
acrimonious debate, which lasted for nearly eight months in the
Asiaweek magazine, I persisted in putting forth my point of view in
approximately 200 words, despite heavy odds (especially mangling of
submitted text by the editors and the uneasiness of having a debate with
an anonymous guy who is scared to reveal his name).
It was also unusual for an international
magazine to open its Readers Forum for such a lengthy volley of exchange
between two correspondents. But as long as the Asiaweek was
interested in hearing my view I didn’t give up, since I felt that at least
I could educate the editors of Asiaweek and some unbiased readers.
My last response to Letter 6 (noted above), unfortunately didn’t appear in
print. If a copy survives in my files, it’s bad that as of now I couldn’t
retrieve it. When the debate began, I was residing in Philadelphia. By the
time, it came to an end, I have moved to Osaka.
I wish to touch on a related issue
mentioned in the debate. When I wrote these letters 11 years ago, I did
not anticipate that the Tamil Tigers will also face a sad episode of
treachery as experienced by George Washington and his army from Benedict
Arnold. But the subsequent episode related to Mahataya's (the then nominal
deputy leader of LTTE) downfall also shows that the history of Tamil
Tigers has much in common with the history of American revolutionary army.
It demonstrated that treachery and
double cross is part and parcel of independence struggles. It is
apparent that the themes which I have touched on these letters deserve
further exploration from academics, independent analysts and students.