by
M.Nadarajan
The headline in the Daily News reporting the President's speech quoted her as saying "My government has got a clear mandate for peace." She said that at numerous elections her government had obtained that mandate. She did not say whether that included the last elections of April 2004, when her party contested the elections in coalition with the Marxist JVP, which had opposed peace talks, and was hell-bent on defeating the LTTE militarily. I do not think the question of peace was brought up in their mandate, or in their propaganda.
The
President
did
get
that
mandate
at
previous
elections
as
she
said
she
would
end
the
war
and
negotiate
a
settlement.
What
did
she
do
about
it?
After
the
1994
elections
the
LTTE
declared
a
unilateral
ceasefire
and
she
did
try
to
negotiate,
but
was
not
serious
about
it.
While
she
sent
negotiators
who
had
no
political
acumen
and
were
her
personal
friends
and
bureaucrats,
and
who
could
not
take
decisions,
had
to
rush
back
to
her
for
instructions
and
sometimes
changed
decisions
taken
after
discussions
with
her,
her
Foreign
Minister
traversed
the
world
demonizing
the
LTTE
and
canvassing
countries
to
proscribe
them
as
terrorists.
As
a
sage
once
said,
terrorists
are
not
born,
but
created.
The
LTTE
are
freedom
fighters.
Freedom
fighters
who
were
called
terrorists
often
became
"His
Excellencies"
later.
We
do
not
have
to
go
farther
than
the
founding
fathers
of
the
US,
Nelson
Mandela,
Jomo
Kenyatta,
Begin
and
numerous
other
examples.
Naturally
talks
broke
down
in
1995.
The
President
then
unleashed
a
"War
for
Peace"
which
was
the
most
ferocious
combat
till
that
time,
and
brought
about
the
greatest
amount
of
death
and
destruction.
After
the
2001
elections,
when
a
unilateral
cease-fire
was
declared
by
the
LTTE
and
reciprocated
by
the
UNF
government,
followed
by
the
signing
of
a
memorandum
of
understanding
(MOU)
and
the
commencement
of
talk
between
the
UNF
government
and
LTTE,
she
kept
on
criticizing
the
MOU,
as
well
as
the
government,
and
the
facilitator
Norway,
saying
that
they
were
too
partial
to
the
LTTE.
Her
coalition
partners
burnt
the
Norwegian
flag
and
wanted
Norway
to
withdraw.
She
asked
her
Prime
Minister
not
to
go
for
an
appointment
already
made
with
the
Norwegian
peace
envoy.
In her speech the President also spoke of the need to establish the rule of Law, Justice and Equality. Paying lip service to such sentiments are not going to solve anything. The LTTE also wants the same things. The rule of law in LTTE-controlled areas is accepted as very efficient and without corruption. Equality and Justice are what the current government seeks. If that is so, why cannot both parties in the coalition government come to any agreement?
In
the
view
of
the
Sinhalese
politicians,
the
Buddhist
priests
and
the
Sinhalese
public,
who
have
been
brain
washed
by
politicians,
the
Sinhalese
being
in
the
majority
should
be
the
rulers,
and
the
country
belongs
to
them.
The
minorities
are
there
under
Sinhalese
sufferance
and
there
is
no
way
they,
the
chosen
race,
would
concede
equality
to
the
minorities.
Hence,
the
choice
of
religion,
language,
flag,
national
anthem
of
the
country,
access
to
education,
jobs
and
areas
for
development
belong
to
the
chosen
race.
Even
monies
meant
for
development
of
war-devastated
areas
of
the
Northeast
are
sometimes
diverted
to
the
rest
of
the
country.
The
entire
problem
would
be
solved
if
the
concept
of
equality
were
sincerely
and
fully
accepted.
The
President
said
she
understands
the
root
cause
of
the
national
question.
She
has
elaborated
and
blamed
it
all
on
the
opposition.
She
said
that
her
government
has
implemented
serious
programs
to
engage
the
LTTE
for
ten
long
years.
What
rubbish?
What
programs?
Can
she
list
them?
Talks
never
took
place
with
anybody
for
almost
ten
long
years!
Talks
took
place
only
for
a
few
months
in
1994
during
the
time
her
party
was
in
power,
and
for
an
year
and
two
months
with
the
UNF
government
recently.
She
has
said
that
the
LTTE
has
refused
to
return
to
the
negotiating
table.
Another
bit
of
rubbish!
After
having
a
long-held
position
of
demanding
a
separate
state,
in
December
2002
the
LTTE
agreed
to
give
up
that
position
in
exchange
for
meeting
Tamil
aspirations.
It
agreed
to
explore
an
alternative
within
a
federal
structure
with
internal
self-determination.
It
then
went
about
seeking
the
advice
of
international
legal
experts
and
Tamil
expatriate
legal
experts
for
several
months
and
submitted,
for
the
first
time,
a
set
of
proposals
for
an
Interim
Administration
(ISGA)
to
administer
the
Tamil
homeland
and
bring
normalcy
to
the
lives
of
the
Tamil
people
who
had
been
badly
affected
by
war.
It
has
requested
that
talks
begin
on
the
basis
of
the
ISGA,
and
the
political
leader
of
LTTE,
Tamilselvan
has
said,
"We
are
prepared
to
talk
even
tomorrow."
He
has
also
said
that
the
proposals
could
be
negotiable.
The
President
also
shed
crocodile
tears
on
the
question
of
"child
soldiers."
If
she
was
so
concerned
about
children,
why
did
her
armed
forces
kill
thousands
of
children
and
bomb
schools,
playgrounds
and
even
churches
where
refugees
were
asked
to
take
refuge
by
the
armed
forces
themselves.
On
the
question
of
child
soldiers,
as
in
the
case
of
terrorists,
one
should
look
at
the
reasons
why
children
become
soldiers.
Few
would
do
so
due
to
bravado
and
excitement.
Most
join
for
one
or
more
of
several
reasons.
Some
because
all
members
of
the
family
have
been
killed
in
the
war
and
they
have
nowhere
to
go,
others
out
of
anger
when
members
of
their
families
have
been
killed
or
attacked
in
front
of
them,
yet
others
join
to
get
at
least
a
square
meal
a
day
and
clothes
to
wear,
yet
others
because
their
schools
have
been
destroyed
and
they
do
not
have
anything
to
do.
The
government
can
figure
out
how
many
of
these
categories
are
the
creations
of
the
armed
forces
and
therefore,
the
government.
The
LTTE
has
said
that
it
does
not
send
children
to
the
battlefront
till
they
are
18
years
of
age.
Till
then
they
are
given
training
and
schooling.
In
any
case,
after
the
interference
of
UNICEF,
the
LTTE
has
co-operated
with
it
and
released
over
1,500
children
to
their
parents.
We
read
about
many
instances
of
children
being
handed
over
to
their
parents
when
they
come
to
join
the
movement.
UNICEF
and
the
Red
Cross
are
witnesses
of
this.
The
President
said
further
"a
comprehensive
development
strategy
has
been
launched
in
the
North
and
East
affected
by
the
conflict."
We
have
not
seen
any
such
strategy.
We
are
aware
some
appointments
were
made
to
government
positions
for
Northeast
development.
All
appointees
were
Sinhalese,
just
as
most
policemen
in
Tamil
areas
are
Sinhalese,
who
do
not
understand
the
language
of
the
local
people.
Unfortunately,
in
the
scheme
of
things
Tamils
have
no
faith
that
such
appointees
would
consciously
develop
Tamil
areas.
No
funds
have
actually
been
allocated
for
this
alleged
'development'
out
of
the
government
budget.
The
President
has
thanked
the
international
community
for
the
strong
support
they
give.
When
lies
are
repeated
often
enough
they
appear
to
be
the
truth.
Most
of
her
statements
made
are
for
the
consumption
of
the
IC
without
any
regard
for
the
truth.
The
President
has
spoken
eloquently
on
rule
of
law,
justice
and
equality,
and
referred
to
the
prince
of
peace,
Buddha.
We
totally
agree
with
the
President,
but
rather
than
stop
at
words,
let
us
look
at
deeds.
It suits the President to join in "the global, endeavor to fight terrorism." She also generously praised the UN and its institutions for what they represent and what they do for world peace and order.
Gracious words indeed, obviously with ulterior motives. This is the same UN that her Foreign Minister said was only fit enough to eradicate mosquitoes! He is, however, reported to be eyeing the position of Secretary General of the same organization.