SANGAM.ORG
Ilankai Tamil Sangam, USA, Inc.
Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA

Real Injustice

Washington Post editorial, March 18, 2006

The trouble is that, because of the new law and its interaction with existing provisions, the legal definitions of terrorism, terrorist organizations and material support are so broad that they include countless people who deserve the United States' protection, not exclusion.

When Congress passed the Real ID Act last year, it presumably did not intend to prevent human rights victims all over the world from entering the United States. Its goal was to keep terrorists and those who support them from resettling in the United States as refugees. The legislative language, however, was irresponsibly broad; its effects have been cruel to people already oppressed by vile regimes and terrorist groups. The law needs to be changed.

Terrorists were excluded from the United States even before the Real ID Act, but the law made substantial changes to keep out donors to terrorist groups or others who provide them "material support." The trouble is that, because of the new law and its interaction with existing provisions, the legal definitions of terrorism, terrorist organizations and material support are so broad that they include countless people who deserve the United States' protection, not exclusion.

MAJOR POPULATIONS OF IDPs OF CONCERN TO UNHCR
[at 1st January 2005]
Country IDPs
Colombia* 2,000,000
Sudan 662,300
Azerbaijan 578,500
Liberia 498,600
Sri Lanka 352,400
Russian Federation 334,800
Bosnia and Herzegovina 309,200
Serbia and Montenegro 248,200
Georgia 237,100
Afghanistan 159,500
Côte d'Ivoire 38,000

NOTE: This table reflects only IDPs who are protected or assisted by UNHCR. Source - www.unhcr.org

The law bars associates of any group that contains "two or more individuals, whether organized or not, [which] engages in, or has a subgroup which engages in" activities as general as using an "explosive, firearm or other weapon or dangerous device." The law contains no exceptions for people who are forced to support a group, or for children, or for tiny contributions, or for contributions that took place decades ago. It does not make any distinction between an al-Qaeda member and an armed combatant against a murderous regime. While the government has waiver authority in some cases, it has not yet used this power.

The results are terrible. According to the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees and to officials and academics who have looked at the issue, here are some people who may be barred from entry to the United States: Colombians who were forced to help the leftist insurgency of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia; thousands of Karen and Chin nationals who suffered brutal repression at the hands of the Burmese military junta; Liberian, Somali and Vietnamese Montagnard victims of terrorism and repression; and some dissident Cubans who aided anti-Castro forces in the 1960s. The administration recently acknowledged in one asylum proceeding that those who fought with or aided the Northern Alliance against the Taliban or who supported the African National Congress against South Africa's apartheid government would be excluded, too.

NEW ASYLUM APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED IN SELECTED INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES 1
[in 2004]
Country of Asylum Main Countries of Origin Asylum applications
France Turkey / Algeria / China / D.R. Congo / Serbia-Montenegro 58,500
United States Haiti / China / Colombia / Mexico / Venezuela 56,000
United Kingdom Iran / Somalia / Pakistan / Zimbabwe / China 40,600
Germany Turkey / Serbia-Montenegro / Russian Fed. / Viet Nam / Iran 35,600
Canada Colombia / Mexico / China / Sri Lanka / India 25,800
Austria Russian Fed. / Serbia-Montenegro / India / Nigeria / Georgia 24,600
Sweden Serbia-Montenegro / Stateless / Iraq / Russian Fed. / Azerbaijan 23,200
Belgium D.R. Congo / Russian Fed. / Serbia-Montenegro / Slovakia / Guinea 15,400
Switzerland Serbia-Montenegro / Turkey / Georgia / Stateless / Iraq 14,200
Slovakia India / Russian Fed. / China / Georgia / Moldova 11,400

 

A spokesman for House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), who championed the Real ID Act, says the law's waiver authority gives the government the flexibility it needs to deal with such cases. And the problem could be alleviated if the administration would use that authority aggressively. But that would address only some of the cases, and only by having the government forgiving "terrorism" on the part of refugees whom it should not be labeling terrorists in the first place. This problem can be solved only by Congress. If this mess is not what Mr. Sensenbrenner had in mind, he ought to do something to clean it up.

© 1996-2024 Ilankai Tamil Sangam, USA, Inc.